The hemorrhoid itself
What you notice
In the office
Surgical options
What it costs
Getting started
Read first
Where we see people
Get in touch
Reading
Infrared coagulation
An alternative office procedure that works by coagulating the tissue rather than by cutting off its supply with a band. It is applied under direct visualisation through an anoscope, and nothing is left in place afterwards.
How it differs
Infrared coagulation applies energy directly to the hemorrhoid through an anoscope, under direct visualisation, so the clinician is looking straight at the target while it is being treated. The effect is on the tissue itself rather than on the vessel that feeds it.
That is the real difference from banding, where a band goes on at the base and the tissue above it withers because its blood supply has gone. With infrared there is no band placed and nothing left behind to come away days later.
Which of the two suits you is a question about size and position rather than about one of them being stronger. Both sit in the same group of office procedures for grades one to three, internal disease covers how that grading is established, and the grades guide covers each stage.
The appointment
The anoscope goes in first, because the whole point of this procedure is that the target is visible while it is treated.
Energy is applied to the hemorrhoid itself under direct view, in short bursts rather than in one go.
Because the clinician is watching the target throughout, the effect is assessed during the procedure rather than afterwards.
No band is left in place, so there is nothing to come away later and no general anaesthetic involved.
Choosing between them
Neither procedure is the stronger one in general, and anywhere presenting it that way is simplifying things for the sake of a sale. The sensible way to read the choice is that each one has presentations it fits, and the examination is what identifies which of them you actually have.
Size and position do most of the deciding here. So does what is already known about how you respond, if you have had something done before. None of that can be settled before someone has looked, which is why no option gets promised over the phone here.
For the comparison in full, sclerotherapy is the third option in this group, in office against surgery covers the point at which none of the three is the right answer any more, and the comparison guide argues both sides.
The alternatives
The procedures this sits alongside, and the comparison that matters once an operation enters the conversation.
The most commonly used of the three, and a band is left in place.
Learn moreAn injection, suiting small internal hemorrhoids in particular.
Learn moreWhere office procedures stop being the right tool altogether.
Learn moreThe grading that decides whether any of these three applies.
Learn moreCommon questions
What people ask when they have been offered this rather than banding and want to know why.
Infrared coagulation
The anoscope is in place throughout, so the target is visible while it is being treated rather than afterwards.
No band is placed, so there is nothing to come away in the following days and nothing to notice.
Size and position decide between the office procedures. A clinic ranking them for you is simplifying for a sale.
It sits in the same group as banding and sclerotherapy, for grades that have not settled conservatively.
Get started
The choice between the office procedures comes out of the examination rather than out of a preference. Tell us the symptoms and we will settle it at the visit.
If none of the office procedures is right for your grade, we will say so at the first visit.